I wanted to make something from my indigo dyed pieces from Art Camp. Looking them over, I decided that two pieces were the top and bottom of an apron. Then I cut other pieces for the straps and ties. I hand sewed it all, and it came out pretty descent. Probably would be better if I’d gathered the bottom waist, but the pattern shows this way, so I went the easier way. Finished it at my folks this week.
So I love spinning and weaving, and I love history, so of course I started volunteering in our small town at the Heritage Center and Log Cabins. There, in a corner, was a spinning wheel so one of the first things I set about doing, as a member, was sorting out this wheel which they said the lady who gave it to them had come and spun on it, but it hasn’t been for a little time.
The wheel had a plastic drive band that had been wired together and was of no use whatsoever. So I got rid of it and tied on a new drive band (will take better cordage next time) So now the drive wheel turned with the treadle. The treadle rod is in the middle of the treadle which I haven’t seen before but it had a very smooth motion and was quite easy to treadle.
Then to tackle the scotch tension. It had a piece of plastic cord tied to springs on each side. Now for all I know of scotch tension, that wasn’t going to work, and it didn’t. So I cut that all out and tied another string to the spring on the one side and then tied it around the knob, on the other side, that is there for that purpose (ignored in what was) and then played with the tension.
Did you notice the crochet hook sticking out at an angle in back? Befuddled me for a bit. Thought at first it was used for the orifice hook and that is just where they kept it, but alas it totally doesn’t work for that. Did learn though how to get the bobbin and flyer off. The maiden on the tension end moves back and turns down to take them off. Alas whatever once ran through those holes that keep it in place when all together has long been lost and along the road someone figured out that a small crochet hook fit in just right.
This tension is the problem I think. The flyer and bobbin did not spin if there was the least bit of tension on it. Then after some fiddling, the flyer would spin but the bobbin did not. It was at that point that I learned the importance of both being able to spin. Have you ever wondered why the bobbin needed to spin, albeit slower than the flyer, when spinning on a treadle/flyer wheel? I have. And, as of yesterday, I learned why. With just the flyer turning the draw in is way to fast for these hands to keep up. With the bobbin turning as well, there is time for you to draft and get it right before it winds on.
Also an interesting bit for this wheel is that the flyer and bobbin sit so far back. They are actually, basically, for all practical purposes behind the drive wheel when you are sitting at it. Makes it a bit of a stretch when working back there.
So, yes, I did manage to spin some. That was after realizing there was no orifice hook and a long way for something to reach through. I searched several drawers and finally found one paperclip. After bending it in different contortions, I managed to make it do the job and got some wool through. That also entailed cleaning the hole out with the wool. Icky! But we were spinning. It didn’t go super easy though. I so wanted to add some oil to the bobbin and tension thinking it would help it move smoother. But I also know “they” say to never oil the drive band or tension. So maybe the groove just needs cleaned up more? Or a wider band for the tension. I already know I am going to do that for the drive band, but the tension as well?
After all this, I wanted to know what this wheel was that was driving me crazy. On the bottom I did find a label. Designed & handcrafted by: Victor P. Buchcik, 8 Norman Street, Wagga Wagga 2650″ . Now this label was between all the legs and footman, so not easily photographed or for these old eyes to read. I went looking for a Victor P. Buchcik online. Got that much down. Thought maybe a local builder? There are lots of Czech and Wends around here so names that only the Good Lord knows how to pronounce are in abundance. Alas, nary a hit on the name at all. Next I thought the “8” was an “&” so looked up Norman Street as well as a compatriot in the work. Alas nothing. So looked up Wagga Wagga. A HIT! A town in New South Wales. What? Australia? How did it get here if it was made by some home guy in NSW? I did, at first, think that the four digit number was maybe a number for the piece, but it turns out to be a post code. That took seeing the picture and realizing that Norman Street wasn’t a man but an address. So of course, I looked up the address and it is a nice house though lots of trees in the way of seeing it very well.
If anyone knows anything about this wheel or the maker, I would appreciate knowing something of them. If you have advice on getting it to spin smoother or dealing with that scotch tension, advice appreciated.
Yes, my loom is warped, and I did start weaving. I need to get back out there again and get with it. Alas there is a little snag in the plan. But anyways, my plan to begin with was to weave red, white, and blue cloth to make either a valance or swag over some of the windows between the living room and the gallery above. (Now I know gallery is a big word but coming up with a proper name for the walkway between the two sides of the house above was difficult and so I settled on gallery.)
Because of the mix of yarn sizes I had, this became a mix of ideas in the warp. My loom has a sectional back beam (something I became once again thankful for when I tried to help someone warp front to back recently) with one inch sections. So I just made up a threading for each inch in color and sizes. I was using both 8/12 and 16/2 cotton in this. I then tried to repeat the same pattern in mirror image for the two sides as I worked out from the center. Alas, in threading the reed I realized that a couple weren’t exactly the same but que sera at this point. It will look fine and it isn’t quite noticeable … though more noticeable in this picture than when I’m sitting and working on it.
Next came the trouble of what to use for weft. In the top picture if you look in the distant top right corner, you can see a bobbin of 16/2 blue thread. As there was so much of it, the plan was for it to be the weft. Alas and alack, It just didn’t look right. Above you can see where I used some size 3 cotton crochet thread to get the spacing done. Then I used the 16/2 blue. Yikes! the crochet thread looked so much better. The colors were just lost in the 16/2. So it was start weaving again with the crochet thread and it did look quite good. I did need a bit of practice on those selvedges but as I was only doing a straight twill I could concentrate on them, instead of a pattern, and things became better.
Then I quickly ran out of crochet thread in size 3 and navy blue. That’s ok, I’m running to Bastrop and can visit Hobby Lobby and get some more. But best laid plans. They didn’t have something that I consider so common. At least in right size and color. Guess still too much in the middle of nowhere. So I got what they did have and will see if it works. If not, I will try some other things with what I have and if all else fails will take a trip to Yarnorama and see what they have.
I did take a picture of the weaving at that point, but it just didn’t look good so it went to the trash bin and will have to wait to see the finished piece. I’m not sure how it will look in the end when wet finished, but I do like the colors and it will be interesting to see what happens. I’m thinking a more valance look is what is going to happen as opposed to swag but that will be ok. It actually will go farther that way.
So I was dyeing Saturday and my pieces are now washed and dried and ready for a new life. But what did I get?
I couldn’t get pictures that really showed the colors well. Still a lot to learn with a camera. But this piece came out just lovely. (At the rate I’ve used lovely on this and the last post, you would think I’d been spending time reading items from England, and you would be right.) But anyway, I dropped this piece of silk in the cochineal pot first. Didn’t stay in long but it did come out a nice pink color. Then I dropped it in the indigo pot. When I pulled it out, I was amazed at the lovely color. It shows a bit of the pink and the blue but mainly it is this absolutely lovely mauvey purple. I will have to find a use fitting to its color and silk.
Here are the three dresser scarves. I bought them while in Germany and the Good Lord only knows what their fiber make up is. But I was thinking that a nice green would be better than white in our new bedroom. So in they went in the osage orange bath. After a good bit of time, they then visited the indigo bath several times. I never could decide if they looked very green but there was definitely a hue there hiding.
But when I got them home and was rinsing them, it was quite an odd event. The water went all yellow/green. It was like the osage orange orange was maybe washing out from under the indigo. Could it be I should have waited longer between taking it out of the osage orange and putting it in the indigo? Odd but we continued rinsing till it was clear. Hmmm… What was I going to end up with?
Again I didn’t get the picture to look as close as I would have liked. But they ended up a very dusty blueish color. They look like there is more grey in them. A quite lovely color though not green. Well, in my eyes. My husband says there is some green there to him. I do love the color. Not what I was hoping for but they aren’t still white, I do like the color, and they will look fine in the bedroom.
So then in went a piece of cotton. First the osage orange a bit of time and then the cochineal. It is not an in your face orange. But very soft. Now I hate yellow and have a dislike of orange, but this came out a nice comforting color. Not bad at all. Will have to find a good use for it as well.
My only other piece was the one that I’m holding in the picture that was suppose to be a video in the last post. It is just a nice mottled blue. A good piece of not very dark indigo.
So my own dyed items from Saturday. It was quite a fun adventure. Not sure I would get enough into dyeing to want to get too particular for particular colors, but having the pots and just experimenting is a good bit of fun. I probably got some colors I like better than if I had tried for something I wanted.
Early Saturday I headed east from Lexington for Jesse Jones Park in Humble where I volunteered when we lived that way. It was fun to head out for a Second Saturday despite the drive being 4 times as long as it once was and it not being perfect weather. Now I know these pictures make it look like a lovely day, but the weather was a fickle maiden this day.
The theme of the day was food from the fire. There was a wild pig spitted and roasted over night to be enjoyed. These pigs are way too abundant and tear up all in their path. There were also set ups of castiron dutch oven cooking with savory and sweet. Wonderful tastes for all to enjoy.
But I also took out the dyes left over from Art Camp and as a continuation of the theme from last month, spinning and weaving, we had some dyeing going Saturday this month as well as a new weaver trying to learn to warp a loom and people wanting to know what that wheel did.
We had the three pots from Art Camp going. The cochineal and osage orange on a very low fire that someone put more wood on that shouldn’t have. Oh well, it didn’t ruin anything, but my idea of a small fire and others wasn’t quite the same. Then the indigo pot was at work on the table. We tried to make sure we did everything as we were taught at Art Camp, alas, and with me there is always an alas, but alas we did have one bit that never got put out but it wasn’t a flop so can’t complain.
The afternoon was spent trying to keep the occasional drizzle and big drops out of the pots. Especially the indigo. We dropped in cloth the park is going to make into aprons. Roving of both cotton and wool went in different pots. Dresser scarves of unknown fiber. And Maureen even took off her apron when she decided she would love a blue one instead of white.
We were thankful that the Lord provided us with a tree that had a branch that just went off on its own almost horizontal to the ground. As we were out without a clothes line the leaning branch became our old fashion hanging rack to let the indigo items air in the oxygen before going back in the pot.
I had pieces left over from Art Camp so threw some of them in the pots. So we experimented. I even went for an orange and it isn’t a bad one either. I don’t really care for orange but it is quite muted. I also threw in a silk piece. First in the cochineal and then the indigo. It is the most lovely mauvey purple one could want. I so love how it came out.
I did ask about the time once and a gal said that it was late. I about panicked as I did have a two hour drive home. But it turned out her definition of late and what I would have called late back in my old days at the park were two different things. It was actually just normal time when things start shutting down. We had two hours yet before we would have thought it late in the old days. Doesn’t that sound bad. But those days are over a year ago now. Time sure flies when you’re older.
We did get the fun of watching the cloths come out of the indigo bath and turn from a yellow green to blue. I don’t think I will ever be tired of watching the magic happen. We even had the idea of trying to get some video of it happening. But best laid schemes. We were all ready and pulled out the cloth, had video going, or so it seemed. After I got home and watched it, it turned out it didn’t start at the first press of the button, but started when it was pressed again to stop. So I clipped a picture of the cloth all blue and if one were to want to they can watch the top of the table and listen to us talk to visitors who came by while we were trying to do this. Oh, and yes my dress is my first outfit that I don’t wear anymore, but if one is playing around dye baths, if I’m playing around dye baths, I figured I better wear something that wouldn’t matter if I spilled the indigo completely over. Actually, I made it out with only my hands very blue but with some scrubbing, I only have blue finger nails now. It is wearing off but indigo does love protein. And yes, my hair is down. I had to wash it Friday, and there was just no way it was going to stay in a bonnet. So it won and I had a mess to comb out when I got home.
So I did sit down and weave a square in the corner. It actually went better than any went before which can be seen by the end of this post. So here goes. I am assuming that you have read the last two posts and so am not going to repeat some things from them. I am going to assume you know what you are doing in some points. But this time we are going to be catching loops on all four layers so the needle will be busy.
First thing is again to line up the loom at the sides so that pins match. The double loops on both finished squares are in the corner and the double loops that go around the corners are at the ends. This made this one easy to get going.
So on the first layer, you begin with catching the loop that goes to the side facing our new square. We do not want to catch the loop that goes to the other side at all.So now to continue with the first layer catch the second loop in each pair since we will be going around the two pins to the left of each set of three pins.
When finished with the first layer, and you come around the corner, be sure and pick up only the loop on that side of the corner and not the one that faces the outside.
Now you continue down the row with the second layer. Going around the second and third pin in each set of three, make sure you pick up the right hand loop of each pair.
So you made it to the end of the second layer and now to go around the corner of two pins.
Pick up the same loop as did on the first layer. Oh, dear. This is the loop that is to be to the outside of this square and we should not go through the same loop as before. I didn’t realize I did it here, and that I shouldn’t have, till looking at the pictures. But if you look at the following picture, you will see this done correctly on the opposite corner. That outside loop around the double pins does not loop with a finished loop. But after you just circle the pins, continue on layer 3 and picking up the other corresponding loop to the set of pins. Actually, should be the only loop left in each set of two. Also around this time you will be joining with a new thread. If you cut one long one you are going crazy with all the knotting, but with each layer the thread is getting shorter and thus easier.
Now you are finished with the third layer and starting the fourth. We are going to go around the two pins on the outside and do not pick up a loop before starting to weave the first row. This loop is the outside loop of this square and would be caught up with a square on that side. (This is the correct way to do the corner just above.) So do not catch up the loop on the finished square at this point. Did I say that enough times? Do not catch this loop. But continue weaving this fourth layer as normal and catching the leftover loop of each pair as you come around the two pins that correspond to it.
So here is the finished square taken off the loom. Looks pretty good except for that mistake at the top right corner. The dark green loop should just be through the lower loop that is mainly on that side and not the top one that it is also through. Besides that I think it came out pretty good. I may even grow to like the open space between the four squares. I want to reenforce that point but as you’ll see in the next picture, I haven’t come up with a good way to do that. Maybe I should trust it on its own.
So here is my sample for seriously figuring this out. I have connected 8 squares in two rows. (Like you couldn’t figure that out on your own.) I started with the first ones on the right, and I worked my way left. So the two I documented yesterday and today are the two on the far left side. You can see my two experiments with strengthening the inside corners in the first two but they just don’t look nice. Also quite a bit of learning showing there but I think I’ve got a plan and system now for doing it. Now to try in a perfect piece. I see a scarf in there waiting to look nice.
I sat down again yesterday and wove squares together trying to make it look better and make decisions about those short corners. I did come up with a third bit of advice though while doing it.
Advice 3. They would work much better with a sticky grabby yarn. I’m using cotton crochet yarn as it is easy to see what is happening, alas it also shifts very easily and can go wonky easily. I think a nice grabby wool with all those barbs helping out would keep the yarn in place better.
Next just a bit about how I finish squares. I know “they” tell you to just bring those two tails back in over and under a couple of wefts and then cut them off. For me (being me) that just looks a bit odd. Just this short thick bit that stands out. Like a mistake. But I also have a tendency towards over kill on making things secure. When I package a box to mail, you can bet there is tape everywhere, and the poor person getting the box will have a time breaking into it. But my goal is that nothing in transit will break into it as well. So back to the squares. I take those tails and weave them all the way across before cutting them off. So you will see that on two sides of each square that last thread is doubled and two sides it is not.
So one last comment before starting. Remember from yesterdays post to cut your yarn before starting. It calls for 8 yards for the full square, so cut two 4 yard lengths and start with one of them. When getting near the end use a Russian Join to connect them and continue on weaving.
The first step in weaving two squares together is to make sure that you line up sides to match. If you look at the loom on each side there will be 3 pins at one end and 2 pins at the other end. Those two pins match to two pins on the touching side and they create two loops that go around the corner. So be sure that when you lay the loom and square down together that the 3 pins match up to 2 loops that are all committed to that side (the top of the photo) and the 2 pins are match up to the two loops that come around the corner (bottom of the photo).
Also you can see that in this first photo I have already laid in the first layer. It is easier to lay the square and loom together so that the first layer you can just lay in and then only have half the length of yarn to weave through loops on the second layer. You can even flip the finished square over if needed to get it to line up for you. Yes, that took me a bit longer than it should have to figure out.
After the first layer is laid in then you start the second layer the normal way. When you get to your finished square, I find it easier to catch the loop after I have the yarn between its proper pins and heading back for the next weft. So on this second layer you are wrapping the yarn around the top and middle pin in each group (per my photo) so the loop, from each group of the finished square, you want to catch is the top one that corresponds.
Now in the above photo the second layer is completed.You can see at the far left that where the two pins are I only caught the loop that is on that side and not the one that technically faces the left side of the square (as opposed to top per photo). I have done this several ways and still fiddling with it.
Now with this photo you can see that the third layer is laid in as you would if doing a normal square by itself. Nice to have an easy run again. If you look closely at the top left you can see where my Russian join is. Not as nice a one as my illustration yesterday, but maybe that is so you can tell it is there. I have also started the needle down for that fourth layer. Remember here is where you start weaving over under every other warp thread, and we are finally creating a woven piece that won’t come apart. I am still amazed at whoever dreamed this whole process up first and figured out that you could weave this way.
When weaving the fourth layer and you come to the finished square, you will pick up that other loop in each pair. So now we come around the bottom two pins in each group and going over the other, we will then start weaving over and under the warp threads as we head back down the row. Now it is easier to see why you pick up which loop you do in each pair as they line up.
Once you have woven all 16 wefts in then you weave in your tails as much as you want. I did catch that same loop again that we caught on the second layer. The one of the two that go around the corner that is more to this side.
Ok, yes, it does need to be taken off the loom and tails cut but those pictures didn’t make the grade. And yes, I know there is a bit of fuzziness to these so you can only guess how bad those were.
Next we will add a square into that spot at the top and have two sides to weave into it. Fun!
Yesterday I vacuumed the downstairs and upstairs at one time. Anyone, who knows me well, knows I absolutely hate vacuuming. That may be a bit strong, but I really don’t like it and can put it off forever. So needless to say, after such an ambitious workout, I had to sit and weave. So I set about to improve weaving those little squares off the Zoom Loom together while making them.
So to begin with, how about some advice? I know I like things to be really easy. Alas life isn’t easy. But when weaving this long of a piece of yarn at once, you really need to cut it in two. Each should be enough thread to do two of the four layers. (Or maybe you want to do each on its own, but I found that two layers at once did work.) So roughly 4 yards long each. Now what can happen if you don’t?
If you try to weave it all with one long thread, inevitably on that first pass of weaving into the loops of the finished square, you will end up with tangles and thread coming off of the posts. The only good in this is that the yarn has a size large enough that you can see the tangle and pull on the correct thread to undo it. But… Who wants to spend all that time untangling knots and then putting the thread back on the post that it was pulled off. Now I don’t like to waste things, and I wasn’t going to just chuck this, so yes, I untangled the mess, got the thread laying back in its proper path and then worked even more carefully. Alas it still tangled up. So my advice. Cut the length in two. You do need to cut it before starting to weave. This is different than the standard directions for weaving a square where you just take the end of your yarn and lay it in place for the first three layers and then wrap the yarn around the square 5 times and cut the thread. Then you thread it onto your long needle and start weaving it in and out.
So once you have decided to weave using two lengths you will need to join them when almost at the end of the first one. When I was learning to weave on a triangle loom, I became good friends with the Russian Join. I have a tendency to want color changes so needed to find a way to do that with the least knot showing. So it was a happy day when I discovered this method of joining two threads. Here it also works well.
Take the end of the yarn you are working with, and using a tapestry needle, weave it back into itself leaving a loop.
Next take your second piece of yarn and thread it on the tapestry needle and then thread it through the first loop. After you have them entwined then weave in and out of itself just as you did with the first one.
Now you take your two ends that are short and hanging out and pull them tight. Scrunching up the loop till it disappears. I pull them as tight as I can at first to get it as snug as I can. Then I smooth it back out and make it lay as smooth and as flat as it can. This particular thread does that well.
So once you snug it up, then cut those loose ends off close without cutting the wrong piece. It is rather nice how it can blend in to the rest of the weaving and is hardly noticeable.
So there is my first two pieces of advice for going crazy. Since all this will be long, I will start weaving two together tomorrow.
Yes, I had a desire to dye my workhorse apron blue. It is the apron that has managed to make it to more than one entry here. From the moment that I wove the cloth and completed the sewing. Then it has been a help so many times – needing hot pads for cast iron pots or an umbrella in a gully washer. On a hot Texas summer day, it was so handy for wiping away sweat. It had all the marks of its life but still going strong as ever.
But what does one do when they come home with indigo? They look for something to turn blue and my apron went in the pot. I poured out the large container of dye into a bucket my husband got me, and I let it sit. Then I added color release (oh, what is its proper name?) to the pot a couple of times and then got a fairly green paper towel twist. So in went the apron. And then laid out. It was a bit windy this particular day so hence the cardboard protecting the pot from blowing bits of this and that while awaiting the next dunking.
At first I didn’t think it was really working and I was going to have to go in and read a good bit more. But… Then I pulled it out and it had that greenish hue that was exciting to see turn blue. So I laid it out to oxidize and came back later. In it went again. I so wanted to get a picture of that greenish hue before it really oxidized but alas and alack it always turned before the camera could catch it. Even when I got the tripod out and only had to hit the button. I am wondering though about slowing that change down. I’m sure it had to do with how well set up the pot was and as I’m still a green newbie at it… Much to learn yet.
But for a good bit of the day I kept dunking the apron and then taking it out. Laying it out to oxidize. Constantly having to move the drying rack as the sun passed across the sky as I did read to keep it in the shade while processing. It started much closer to the back door than it finished.
I loved the dark wet color so kept at it a couple more times and finally declared it done and let it dry completely. I could be happy if it were even darker than it is but all in all it is a pretty good color. Then I read Connie’s notes on finishing and so I washed and set and declared it completed. That was just in time to wear it last Saturday.
Saturday, Texas 180th Independence Day celebration was at Washington-on-the-Brazos not far from me. Since joining the guild in Bryan, I had the opportunity to go out to Barrington Farm and demonstrate spinning for the day. I love spinning and talking history so what is a better way to spend a day? As I was getting ready to head out early, Mark got a picture of me in my handwoven dress and now handwoven, partly handspun, indigo dyed blue apron. Had the car packed with my wheel, wool, cotton, bench, niddy noddy, and much more, because you never know what question will be asked or what you will decide that you wished you had brought along.
It was a beautiful sunny day. With a wonderful breeze that only got in the way when trying to card wool and then take it off the cards and roll it up. I learned to aim the cards in just the right direction to let the breeze help me and not hinder.
I had several great conversations. I guess when you love history, and you think everyone should love it as much as you, and they should want to learn all they can; you love it when someone comes by and wants to listen and ask questions. Though near the end was the best part of the day. A group stopped by and the mother had that look of someone who had spun out of necessity in her life. I asked if she had and through her children translating for us, I learned she had spun but with a wheel that you turned with a handle. I did a first and asked if she would like sit and try my wheel out. I never let people touch it when demonstrating, but I couldn’t help myself here. I learned that they were from Damascus, and I was amazed that here was a lady from the oldest city in the world (continuously lived in) sitting at my wheel taking part in one of the oldest occupations in the world. I was so in the moment that I just lived it and now have so many questions I would love to ask her and her children. She had that wonderful old sweet grandma look about her and her kids were in their 20s or so maybe young 30s by my guess. Oh, I want to talk with them now.
That aside I had a wonderful day. Lovely day. Sweet day. Thank you Lord for the blessing of it.
And you never know who you will meet.
So I have written a bit lately about CHT Art Camp. Between here with my dyeing adventure and for the CHT Newsletter. You’d think I would be tired of writing about it by now but I have continued on the journey that began with a challenge that was given to me at camp and well – what is one to do but take it up and make it happen?
Sunday evening I was sitting with some gals from my dyeing class and we were chatting and I was making little squares with my Zoom Loom. Well, despite feeling quite brain dead, I was mesmerized by a thought that one gal had about the Zoom Loom. Could you weave two squares together and then not need to connect them afterwards? Somehow have one completed square beside the loom and weave in the new one to it?
It doesn’t matter how brain dead one may feel, one must take up a challenge and see if it could be done. And guess what? I managed it. Well, barely that evening.
The idea was to see it with two different color of squares, which would be ideal, one could weave it and then see how it went together. Alas I only had the one yarn with me to try, so I made two squares with different patterns to differentiate them.
I wove one and then had a time to get brain cells to work together, but I decided to cut enough yarn for a second square and then I decided to cut that in half so that I wasn’t weaving it all through the connections. I laid in the first layer. Then I wove into the finished one on the second layer. When I got to the end of the yarn I made a russian join with the second piece of yarn and then laid in the third layer. Then came the harder bit. I was so brain dead I knew I had a problem but couldn’t figure it out. I have made so many of these squares I could do it in my sleep but not this evening. I had to get out the booklet and figure out what I was suppose to be doing. I finally found my silly problem and got back at it. So with the fourth layer you weave the actual square but also making sure to catch the loop to the first one as well.
I made it work! I was happy, though it did look a bit sad, it had worked.
I then got home and decided to keep working on the idea so wove five squares together. The middle one was a pattern square and the two on each side were just done plain weave. And not leaving well enough alone, I decided it was time to try dyeing at home with the indigo I had brought home with me from Art Camp.
So here is my home setup. I didn’t think to take pictures at first so none of that first dip. I was afraid at first that it wasn’t going to take but after a few it kept getting darker and was working. Adding the color remover worked to get that look I was looking for in the solution.
So taking a clue from camp I spent the day walking by and lowering it into the dye, walk away, taking it out of the dye, finding a way to hang it up to oxidize, walk away, and repeat. I actually was even having fun getting pictures when it dawned on me to take them.
I must say that it was fun and these five squares were connected without seaming. I did learn in doing the five that it matters which ends you connect with (accidentally did that correct at camp.) And that you want to pick up the second loop first in each set. So if I do this again, it will come out even better. Right? Always looking to improve.
This was ever so exciting to see and do. So simple. So amazing. Even seeing that bit of yellow turn to blue. I debated still going further with the dye to get it even darker but it is quite dark on its own so think this is it for this piece.
So here is a closeup of one of the connections woven together. Do we really like closeups of our work where it is shown to us at 5 times larger than it really is? Guess what? I just noticed that I missed a loop. Or did I catch the wrong bit at the first? Looks like there could be three there. Or … hmm…. guess there is room to still improve and make this work better.